Why the handoff should name the likely MuQ challenger explicitly
Constraint: The next implementation step should not waste time rediscovering the most likely MuQ model identifier after the MERT baseline is already live Rejected: Leave MuQ as a generic future challenger | forces the next session to repeat model-name discovery work Confidence: medium Scope-risk: narrow Directive: Treat OpenMuQ/MuQ-large-msd-iter as the first MuQ challenger candidate to try unless newer repo-local evidence supersedes it Tested: markdown link check on /workspace/docs after updating handoff notes Not-tested: MuQ model loading itself is still pending
Showing
3 changed files
with
7 additions
and
0 deletions
-
Please register or sign in to post a comment